<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IFR low enroute Area charts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skycharts.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skycharts.net/?p=1065</link>
	<description>Current aviation maps for mobile devices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 07:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.35</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heikki</title>
		<link>http://www.skycharts.net/?p=1065#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heikki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skycharts.net/?p=1065#comment-218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you like the current implementation with Area charts when zoomed in ?
Do you think there is need for a separate chart ? 
What area chart do you use and I&#039;ll take a closer look at it.

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you like the current implementation with Area charts when zoomed in ?<br />
Do you think there is need for a separate chart ?<br />
What area chart do you use and I&#8217;ll take a closer look at it.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Tarrel</title>
		<link>http://www.skycharts.net/?p=1065#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Tarrel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skycharts.net/?p=1065#comment-217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would definitely like the IFR area charts as, like the TAC charts, they provide more detail. It would be convenient to have them work like the TAC charts, too: i.e., they are a separate chart type, but when you zoom in, the display automatically goes for Low Alt enroute to the area chart. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely like the IFR area charts as, like the TAC charts, they provide more detail. It would be convenient to have them work like the TAC charts, too: i.e., they are a separate chart type, but when you zoom in, the display automatically goes for Low Alt enroute to the area chart. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
